The Kaiser’s War – Allies Turn 2 and Central Powers Turn 3

Boardgames, Sessions, World War I

The Allies added three (3) Italian and one (1) US Army during their mobilization phase.  The Italians will arrive at the beginning of Turn 3, with the US Army not arriving until Turn 4.

Arriving Allied units were fed into gaps on the Western Front and Italy.  A French army sailed to and arrived in Salonika. The Allies did not mount any attacks, content to remain on the defensive this turn.

At the end of the turn, the Victory Point count was Central Powers @ 132 and Allies @ 60.  This would be a significant Allied victory if the game ended.

The calculation of victory points is a little different.  Each country has a basic victory point production of 43 points.  I had to figure that out myself.  These points are for Major Capitals, Resource Centers and Political Cities occupied at the beginning of the game.  My understanding is that these points (+/- points for enemy capitals, resources, political cities taken) are added at the beginning of the turn to the net victory points calculated at the end of the preceeding turn.

Here are the three major theaters and the end of the game turn.

The Central Powers started Turn 3 by mobilizing one shock army and deploying the few units they had (or could) mobilize at the beginning of Turn 2.  Another series of shock army attacks on the Western Front drove back the newly arrived US Army.  They managed to avoid elimination by a fortunate die roll.
To the East, continued attacks drove Allied units back into Rome and Genoa.  These will be tough cities to capture, but are needed for victory points.
German, Austrian and Bulgarian armies continued to advance in Salonika, eliminating the original French Army.
One aspect of the rules that takes some getting used to are Zones of Control (ZOC).  Unlike many other games,  friendly units (except those representing fortified zones, or trench lines) do not negate enemy zones.  So, a unit can be eliminated if retreating through a friendly hex in a enemy ZOC, or if a supply line runs through a friendly unit, but that unit is in an enemy ZOC.

The Kaisers War – Central Powers Turn 2

Boardgames, Sessions, World War I

The Central Powers continued their attacks both in Italy and along the Western Front.

In Italy the attacks came up just short of capturing Genoa, but did expand Turn One’s gains along the Adriatic.

Two British armies were pinned along the coast and destroyed near Calais.  German units are now adjacent to Paris.

Combined German and Austrian attacks captured Salonika, cutting off Allied armies from that port.

Here are photos of each front showing dispositions at the end of the turn.

The Kaiser’s War – Allies Turn 1

Boardgames, Sessions, World War I
Unlike the Central Powers, the Allies have no limitations effecting their Turn 1 Mobilization Phase.  Italian, French and British armies are mobilized (cannot enter until Turn 2), and a US army with Pershing’s headquarters, already mobilized, is sailing to France.  This will all cost victory points, but the situation in Italy is bordering on the desperate, and additional units are needed for operational flexibility (that’s a nice euphemism for “jeez I have no idea what might happen next”).
In Italy, a very weak defense has been strung out to (hopefully) delay the Central Powers until reinforcements arrive.  In the West, a fairly strong defense has been established north of Paris.  British forces are advancing towards Beirut and moving west of Baghdad.
Here’s the situation in Salonika, Italy, and Western Front

What’s In Here?

Colonials, Miniatures, Sessions

While pawing through a closet I found a WalMart plastic bag.  “What The Hell Is This?”. Well, this is this…….

Forgot I had put together small Central Asian and Russian forces for “The Men Who Would Be Kings” last summer/fall.  Purchased them over at wargamevault.com
I did bring a game mat (if you can call a bolt of sand colored cloth purchased at Jo Ann’s Fabrics a game mat) with me.  The intent was to break out my World Of Fun Napoleonics and mess around with the Valour and Fortitude rules on the dining room table at some point during my stay.  That might still happen.
But, why not a couple of quick and fun games with these?

The Kaiser’s War – Central Powers Turn 1

Boardgames, Sessions, World War I
Finished up the Central Powers’ turn.  Went all-in for both the Western and Italian Front offensives.  Used up victory points  to provide Maximum Attack Supply (which doubles unit attack values) in order to get odds of 5:1.
Each side has two combat phases (consecutive) per turn where any units can attack. With a Defender Panic combat result the defenders are eliminated if they roll a D6 greater than their movement allowance (most units have a movement allowance of “3”).  If not eliminated, they must retreat a number of hexes equal to that die roll.
The results were mixed.  In the West, the attacks were successful in forcing the engaged British units to retreat.  However, they did so in good order and were not eliminated.  A different story in Italy, where two Italian units were destroyed and a gaping hole opened (Caparetto).
Further east, Central Powers armies are massing along the Salonika Front.
Here are a photographs of the Western and Italian Fronts, respectively.

Kaiser’s War – Initial Dispositions

Boardgames, Sessions, World War I

My resolve remains high.  Set up and ready to play.

With my usual lack of imagination, the Central Powers (CP)  focus is on The Western Front and Italy.  No ahistorical play right now.

The rules highly incentivize the CP player to attack in the West.  Tempting bonuses for using Storm units and occupying Allied (A) trenchlines at the end of Turn 1.

Here’s the situation in the West, followed by that in the East.  Play starts tomorrow…..I mean it!

 

This Time I Really Mean It

Boardgames, Sessions, World War I

Boardgame Geek has a wargame forum thread entitled something like “What’s Your Table Look Like”.

Well, my table here in the Sunfish Capital of the World has been dipped in amber.  I’ve had The Kaiser’s War: 1918 on a card table for well….this is the third calendar year.  I think the initial map placement was in Fall 2022.

I’m setting it up now.  All credit to the dreary, rainy, windy weather of the past two weeks.  Yes, the forecast for the next several days is good, but it is now a matter of pride.

So, what approach to take?  Option Number One is a well thought out consideration of the strategic situation and painstaking referrals to the rules.  Option Number Two is just play the damn game.  I’m going with Option Number Two.

Not that I have something else lined up, but I’m genuinely curious how this system will play, especially since it has – by definition – many of the same “option(s) of difficulties” encountered in Paths of Glory and Pursuit of Glory, but using a traditional hex and counter approach without event cards or even random events.

Here’s a quick shot of the map with sorted counters and the beginnings of the Allied set-up.

I’ll finish the set-up tomorrow and get at it….really…..I mean it this time…..

Where Am I?

Uncategorized

Only a couple of weeks until heading East to  the Sunfish Capital of The World, one other game to play and it’s time to move on from Irregular Wars.

The game in question is Serbia Defiant from the Der Weltkrieg series.  Need a quick play-thru to justify the time it’s been taking up table space (months!).

But first, a summary of the plot lines in the East African Renaissance Campaign.  Need to get this down.  When I resurrected it a few months ago, there was considerable forensic effort needed to get the campaign back on track.  So, here goes; by faction with a map for reference

Behefe:  Now the campaign’s most intriguing faction.  Ruler Bey Mahir’s status received a boost due to his critical help to Neo when they were attacked by Sanwa.  The Persian mercenary, Bey Heydar also received accolades for his skillful handling not only of his contingent, but working with the Neons.  Could Bey Mahir, with Neo support, turn on his mentor, Sultan Efe of Mweyne?

Neo:  Has their leader Sisay profited from his experience?  Has he shrugged off his reputation for being “shy”?  Will Neo go on the offensive to quell any further threats from Sanwa?

Sanwa:  The reputations of both Tamrat, and the mystic leader Kibwe Nkruma have suffered due to their defeat.  Will they seek revenge, or be deposed?

Kattego:  Will Kattego take advantage of any unrest in Sanwa and  seek revenge for their previous defeat?  Will Ormar remain their leader?

Ekene:  Will the Portuguese become more aggressive given possible unrest in Kattego and Sanwa?

Ottomans:   With their victory at Temple Hill, will the Ottomans continue to focus on an overland advance along the coast, or attempt another  seaborne landing?

Chinese:  Will they commit to an alliance with Mweyne?

Mweyne:  Will Sultan Efe be challenged by his protege Bey Mahir of Behefe?  How can he persuade the Chinese to become his military ally and trade partner?

Battle of Temple Hill – Part 2

East African Renaissance Campaign, Miniatures, Renaissance, Sessions

A prolonged struggle due in no small part to my Annual Spring Cleanup.  It’s a once-a-year ritual here at the Pinecone Lodge.  Yes…..pine cones, pine needles along with pine tree limbs large and small, all on-the-curb by May 1.

It was another (in what is becoming a) typical Irregular Wars battle.  The opening stages are orderly, with matters deteriorating into a series of isolated fights brought on by units wavering, scattering and moving beyond their command radius.

The photos illustrate the progression.  In fairness, the terrain on the Ottoman right (Viewer Right) does not lend itself to  neat and tidy contact.

Here we have opening contact on the Ottoman left, with impending contact on the right.

The Ottomans are positioning their reserves for support to  their left.  Because of the risk of losing resolve due to contact from wavering or scattering units in melee, this positioning has to leave lanes open and 2-inch distances from any units in melee.  Their Lord, in the Sipahi unit with blue flag, tries to stay in the center-rear to maintain command.  His Abyssinian counterpart is positioned on the crest of Temple Hill.

The Ottomans prevail on the left, withstanding a counter-attack by the Abyssinian light horse and lancers (with Lord).  The Abyssinians on the right have driven off the Ottoman Azabs, but do not advance, anticipating providing some support to their beleaguered right, which is unhinged due to units wavering, then scattering due to the Ottoman shot.  Again, this scattering causes a loss of resolve to any unit within 2-Units of movement.  This eliminates any nearby wavering unit and the chain reaction I’ve emphasized in past posts.

The Ottoman Akinjis (light cavalry) and Janissaries have now cleared the threat on their right, and the Abyssinian counter-attack has stalled.

Game Over.

Another fun contest, featuring a set of rules that certainly keeps things interesting.

Battle of Temple Hill – Part 1

East African Renaissance Campaign, Miniatures, Renaissance, Sessions, Uncategorized

The Ottoman attack has finally developed.  It took some time to rally unit resolve, and re-align the ranks after the poor Disease and Mishaps die rolls.

Beginning to think that I’m a tactical rut.  Once again (it seems) the main effort is on the left with a demonstration on the right.  Or, is it a terrain placement rut?  I’m not going back in the archives, because I just don’t want to know.  I guess it’s enough to be aware (?).

Trying very hard to honor the command radius distances for each side.  That does make a difference.

I bumped the Janissary missile troops rally value to a “2”, vice “1” based on my past readings of their tactics.  We’ll see how that works when they contact their Abyssinian counterparts.  I did remember one lesson from the previous Ottoman fight; the missile units are backed up by two units of Janissaries with cutting weapons.