Category Archives: World War II

Slow But Not Yet Bloody

Back to playing the Campaign game for Bloody Buna.  Not for the time challenged, as it extends for 43 turns.  The game develops slowly, just like that Sloth/Pictionary commercial that is thankfully off the air now.

The potential for unit attrition dictates modest rates of advance and husbanding of supplies.  Units are battalions or companies, so it is ant-tastic.  But, these can be powerful ants, with the ability to generate high-odds attacks even in unfavorable terrain.

The Japanese have some interesting victory conditions that allow them to not have to take Port Moresby or Milne Bay, but simply threaten it.  This puts the onus on the Allies to contain the Japanese advance, and then roll it back literally to their start point in the vicinity of Buna.

Will post up game summary soon.

 

Grinding Again

Have also set up Bloody Buna. This treatment of the New Guinea Campaign appeared in The Wargamer Magazine way back in 1979. The game has a primary map covering the main area of operations, and then a secondary map covering the Milne Bay area. Units can move between the two utilizing Transit Boxes.

The rules address the salient characteristics of the campaign: horrendous terrain and weather. Supply and movement are defined by both.

Each time a unit attempts to move more than one-half of its allowance, it must take an Attrition Check. On a die roll of 1-4, everthing is fine. However, roll a D5, the unit loses a strength (or “hit” according to the rules), but can proceed. Roll a D6, lose a “hit” and no more movement. In addition, during rain turns, units add a +1 modifier. Only jungle qualified units receive a -1 modifier when attempting an Attrition Check.

Supply is also limited by terrain and weather. Supply line length varies by type of supply unit, and whether at full or half strength. Supply units can provide support for a limited number of turns. Units operate at full strength for three turns, supporting a maximum of 5 combat units per turn, and then at half strength for another three turns, with, again, a maximum of 5 combat units supported.

Artillery can attack alone using indirect fire, that strength varying by range but limited by line-of-sight.

There are also rules for air support, airlift and amphibious landings. Haven’t dug into those yet.

There are three scenarios, as well as a full campaign game. I’m trying the smallest, which focuses solely on the Japanese advance on Milne Bay.

Grinding Pt. 2

Decided to go with the other mini-introductory scenario, Assault on Castle Hill.

Probably missing something, but the tactical options are limited.  After three play-thrus came to the conclusion that the only option for the Germans was to  kill the outpost units using a first impulse artillery attack.  Second impulse then into the outpost units’ area, with the rest of the turn involved taking fire from the adjacent hex.   Turn 2, move-in to Objective Area 9, take the beating and hopefully win the close combat.

Big lesson learned…..one  attack can finish things.  Take a look at this photo of a Artillery Bombardment dice roll.  Yikes.  Game Over….BLAMMO.

The scenario does serve its purpose as valuable learning tool.

Going to continue the grind and now, yes today, set up one of the two longer scenarios.

Grinding

Been working up for a solo play of  Thunder at Cassino.    It’s one of the heirs to Storm Over Arnhem, but with more chrome.

Machine Gun Units and Rubble  impede movement, while terrain regularly effects combat.   The player with Tactical Advantage can designate a Night Turn at any time, using fire and movement modifiers favoring the attacker.

I decided to set-up one of the Introductory (2 Turn) Scenarios – Counterattack At The Roundhouse.  Knowing quite well my excessive problems with a first play-thru, I downloaded the Series Replay from The General Volume 24, Number 6 as a guide to RAW.  These back issues can be found at View From The Trenches.  This is also an ASL site.  Ahhhh…..come on, give ’em a couple of quid.

The positive of all of this programmed stumbling is that one actually learns about the game.  The negative is that it’s not fun by any means (I’d suggest some type of alteration to take the edge off), but it does help you come to grips with RAW, and also offers insights into game play.

Now that this grinding is over, I’ll set up the other introductory scenario and try it on my own.  Grinding is, after all, very appropriate for an Italian Campaign game.

The Channel Dash

That’s the popular name for Operation Cerberus, Germany’s plan to sneak two battlecruisers from Brest to Wilhelmshaven.   It’s also the topic for an Against the Odds Magazine Pocket Battle Game.

It’s an area movement game, with the Germans having to fight off multiple air and surface unit attacks while moving through the English Channel.  However, the German player can use his air assets to attack threatening British surface units.

It’s a fun little game, but, as one reviewer observed, with relatively little replay value.  Why?  The options for each side are very limited.  On the other hand, it’s dicetastic, so any number of situations might arise.   This randomness also makes it a good game for solitaire play.

This pocket battle really pushes the envelope when it comes to rules and chart density.  It is what it is, a game on a postcard.  Lots of information in very small print.  I’m thinking about enlarging it along the lines of a Minden Games footprint.  My only reason for this is that it came with die-cut counters, making it less of a print-and-play type offering which I usually put on thin card stock.

Worth getting at the right price – free with an ATO purchase.

Tim’s Take

Here are Tim’s thoughts:

  • As the German, I’m not sure it if is better to do overruns before combat or afterwards.  More than once, I had a stack stopped and left out of position for the combat phase when it received an adverse result on the CRT.  Maybe overruns are best used to disrupt a key soviet unit (most likely a headquarters unit).  I tried that once and it seemed to work well.
  • I forgot that ZOC’s don’t extend across the Don (even though you reminded me…probably the beer had an impact…).  That explains why I put so much time and effort into that area.  I was trying to extricate a couple of motorized divisions that had gotten ZOC’d up and that I wanted to use elsewhere.  Just like Hougomont at Waterloo, a subsidiary battle took on a life of its own.
  • I belatedly realized that I’d captured Voronezh on turn 2.  There are three hexes of Voronezh and I thought you had to capture all of them to get the VPs for the city…I only needed the two I had captured right away.
  • The Hitler directives do play a role.  I lost a motorized division when I had too many motorized/panzer units in the north and I was reluctant to move units across the Don as I was afraid that a bad die roll would result in them being taken away and sent somewhere else.
  • I enjoyed playing the game and I definitely want to try it again.

Turns 2-5

During Turn 2, the Germans advanced in the north and south, cleaning up Soviet delaying units in the center.  The Soviets pushed reinforcements to conform with the requirement for a continuous line along the Don, as well as in the center.  For the Soviets, the initial crisis has seemed to pass.

End Soviet Turn 2

The Axis continues to develop its attacks in the north and south, while cautiously advancing in the center.

End Axis Turn 3

Soviet reinforcements continue to arrive, with some deploying on the south map anticipating the Axis will “turn the corner” at Rostov.

End Soviet Turn 3

Heavy combat takes place in the north and south, with Axis units now advancing in the center,

End Soviet Turn 4

Intense fighting continues.  The Germans take Rostov and begin moving south.  Soviet forces tenaciously defend in the north, but gaps are appearing in the center.  Fortunately, the bulk of the Axis armor is deployed elsewhere.

End Axis Turn 5

As usual, we had to pick it up just when things were getting interesting.  BTW, this is a 27 turn game…..

 

Opinions, Rules & Playability

Lots of mixed opinions on this game, with the negative a little on the harsh side.

Special rules make Drive on Stalingrad different from its PGG predecessors. For the Axis player, these rules reflect the overarching goal of securing oil resources in the south, Hitler’s operational interference, and competing manpower requirements at Leningrad. For the Soviets, the rules reflect Stalin’s directives and political considerations. Failure to adhere to these special rules results in either a loss of victory points or units.

Most of the on-line discussion centers around the “Hitler Directives” rules. At the beginning of each turn, the German player roles a single die. On an “odd” result, the Directive Table is consulted. These directives involve operational priorities and troop dispositions. A directive remains in effect until it is superceded by another directive.

Hitler’s impact is also reflected in “No Retreat” orders, and the imperative to capture cities. Failure to adhere to these guidelines results in a loss of victory points.

Another Axis operational constraint is “Divisions Across The Don”. If the number of divisions exceeds those called for by the current Hitler Directive, then those divisions are removed for use on other fronts.

The Axis Commander is also limited in the number of mechanized divisions allowed on the north map. If this number is exceeded, these excess divisions are removed.

Both Soviet and Axis players must maintain “Continuous Fronts” on the South map, in which each hex must be occupied by a unit or a zone of control. If not, victory points are lost.

The Soviet player may withdraw from enemy zones of control during a turn, but loses victory points. And, the Soviet player must defend East of the Don River, or lose victory points.

Sure, these rules effect how the game is played; but they are part of the game. Without these rules, the game wouldn’t exist within any historical context. Frustrating, yes. Maybe in this regard, it can be considered a simulation. Axis and Soviet commanders were influenced by higher leadership, and these influence/interference directly effected operations.

Flawed? That’s always a matter of perspective and, even, taste. For me, its flaws are fewer than many games I’ve played.

Drive On Stalingrad – Getting Started

Had a great experience with Drive On Stalingrad (DOS) this weekend over at Tim’s.  Of course, there was football to view, but we were able to get several turns in after our late Friday afternoon setup and initial play-thru.  As always, the first turn was brutal, so it was a quick re-set for Saturday’s action.

The basic system is taken from Panzergruppe Guderian.  However, there are important differences.  I’ll discuss these as the game narrative progresses.

Victory is determined by cities controlled, each of these has point value.  The Axis player (yes, there are Romanians and Hungarians) automatically wins if his victory point total is three times greater than his opponent.

Each side has constraints to their initial dispositions.  The Soviet player must remain on or within a ZOC of an initial defense line stretching across the northernmost of the two game maps.  The Axis player cannot use all of his units during the first turn.

Here’s the initial setup.  North is to the left.  Only the ten or so hexes to the right are in the South map.

The Soviet player has a very limited ability to start with a defense in depth.  On the other hand, the inability to leave ZOCs slows progress for the Axis player, unless a Soviet unit is eliminated or forced to withdraw two hexes.  However, the CRT is relatively bloodless up to 10:1 odds, with most results requiring the choice between withdrawal or a step loss(es).  Punching big holes for the second movement phase (armor/mechanized units only), takes time.

Tim concentrated his armor in the North and South, aggressively advancing in the North.

The Soviets receive 27 (!) units as reinforcements in Turn 1.  A total of three can be placed in a major city, with one each in smaller cities.  Eleven units can move up to 40 hexes by rail.  All I could do was patch up some type of defense in the North, and start pushing reinforcements eastward as fast as possible, using every city I could.

One terrible mistake was to allow the German SS unit to cut my rail line at Voronezh.  Any reinforcements coming by rail from the north had “to take the long way around.”  As a result, three Soviet units were left as a “forlorn hope” to hopefully slow down an Axis infantry advance in the center.

 

 

More Rostov

Cranked out another couple of turns.

Axis was able to make good their deep penetration in the center, as well as develop a flanking attack northwest towards Kharkov. However, the Soviets have built up a defense to counter the panzers, as well as using the rules to “ZOC Up” Axis infantry attacks in the south.

This is the real challenge faced by the Axis Commander.  Soviet units buy time through engaging German units that are unable to exploit tactical success due to the Soviet ability to retreat, perhaps with a one-step loss, but maintain zones of control that limit Axis advances.  Even when there is the possibility for a “ZOC Kill”, a result of less than “2” steps, stops the Axis for an additional turn.  And, in the case of Soviet units with a defense strength greater than “6”, the placement of a step reinforcement.

End German Turn 3
End Soviet Turn 3
End German Turn 4
End Soviet Turn 4

Will develop Axis attack towards Kharkov.

But, for now, off to PDX for Drive On Stalingrad with Tim.