Category Archives: Sessions

Battle of Katlego Faragh – Pt 2

Lord Renaldo ordered his troops to by-pass the Zanj tribesmen now blocking the Faragh (gap).  Planning to take advantage of a screen of Musketeers and Crossbowmen, the Pikemen and Targeteers moved north.  But, with the narrow frontage, the Portuguese units blocked each other, offering the Zanj an opportunity to attack.

These piecemeal attacks were stopped, and Bey Iman Mahir ordered a general withdrawal to the east, planning to retire along a route parallel to the Portuguese advance, but separated by the impassable dunes.

Melee Combat
Zanj Orderly Withdrawal. Tribesmen On The Right Will Also Escape.

While the Bey might be criticized for not pressing home is attacks on the disorganized Portuguese, he was intent on maintaining his army, and most importantly, the high morale of his Civic Guard.  These untested units had acquitted themselves well in the battle.  Bey Mahir believed their success would allow him to recruit more Civic Guard as it was his belief more troops were needed to defeat the veteran Portuguese.  This was especially true since the mercenaries had failed miserably, and could no longer be counted on.  In fact,  there were rumors they might be bribed to change sides.

However, there was real risk in his strategy.  The city of Behefe was not defensible and could not withstand the shortest of sieges.  Its sole water supply was the Oasis of Olufunke, a 15 minute walk south from city walls.    The decisive battle would have to take place there.

What’s In A Number?

Through with Xmas visits/visiting so finally have time/energy/sobriety to post up about another Fire In The Lake game with Tim.

This will be a fuzzy-through-altered-memory overview of the game focusing on my experience, with Tim adding his thoughts in the near future.  As with last time, I had the NVA/VC forces.

First and foremost it was a lot of fun.  We decided to use the historical card option, which allows for a roughly chronological card sequence.  Coup Cards are randomly placed in 12-card groups using each of the three (1964, 1965 and 1968) decks.  There are six total groups to work through, with half of the cards from the larger 1968 deck.

Lesson learned:  When a Coup Card is drawn, get going during the current turn and get set-up to grab some points during the End Turn phase.  While somewhat “gamey” it does (in a way) reflect the chaotic situation that leads to a coup.  The US player cannot use air strikes during the turn prior to the coup (considered monsoon season), so the NVA/VC player can be aggressive without fear of devastating retaliation.

Lesson Learned:  Spend the resources necessary to keep the Ho Chi Minh Trail in good shape.  The source is a “times two the level” source of reinforcements.  This is, literally, a powerful force multiplier.

Lesson Learned:  The  NVA/VC will take casualties.  Inevitable if aggressive operations are launched.  However, casualties can be minimized by using the Ambush option.

Lesson Learned:  Occupying Lines of Communication (LOC) can result in victory points, or at least, tying down US/ARVN resources.

Lesson I Couldn’t Learn:  How to effectively get the VC into cities, where they can disrupt COIN control.  The problem is that they have to reveal their presence, which means they can quickly be “killed”.  Maybe it’s just a matter of using them to soak up US/ARVN options, or flooding a city with VC (Tet).

We managed to get through four Coup Rounds.  At the end of fourth, we discovered (to our surprise – or certainly to my surprise), that the RVN had attained victory by ONE STINKING POINT!  Not a BLAMMO by any stretch of the imagination, but a victory nonetheless.  The good news was that “victory” occurred at about 2200, so we could call it a night.

We’re planning on a another game in the near future.  We’ll switch sides and see what happens!

Battle of Katlego Faragh – Part 1

Jeez….what happened???

For me, writing a wargame after-action report is similar to waking up after a party and figuring out what happened.  It takes a while…….and may lack details.  I admire wargamers who can provide a detailed account of their games (not to mention high quality photos – definitely NOT a characteristic of this site).  However, I just can’t do it.  Why?  I get caught up in the game and am having fun. I don’t take notes at a party, and I just can’t do it consistently during a game.  So, what follows is a series of general impressions and game photos in a rough chronological sequence.

First, game-flow impressions:

  1. The Portuguese were able to gain the initiative for most game turns.
  2. The Civic Guard fought like lions, or the fabled “300”. They held off the Portuguese, lowering the resolve of every unit they came in contact with.  Yes, the narrow gap worked in their favor, and their initial resolve determining die rolls were good (and better than anticipated using a D4), but still, they outperformed expectations, retiring only when their resolve reached a wobbly “1”.
  3. The Portuguese couldn’t get sorted out.  Their hasty attack was probably a bad idea, and it was difficult after that to deploy the right combination of units (fire and shock) to attack through the narrow gap.
  4. They were also cautious.  Lord Eduardo Nicolau Rolando halted his assault to regroup and focus on rallying depleted units rather than continue to attack the weakened and withdrawing Civic Guard.
  5. The inexperienced Bey Iman Mahir did an excellent job of moving his tribal units initially deployed east of the gap, to a supporting role.  He also managed to extricate the Civic Guard units in good order.
  6. However, the Bey’s initial deployment east of the Faragh caused his Civic Guard to be beyond command radius and subject to the wackiness of the Impetuous Actions table.  Luckily for the Bey, he quickly moved west, and most of his companies did not act too impetuously before brought under control, although the Mercenary company “Ran Away” for three consecutive turns, and off the battlefield.  In fact, the initial disruptions in the Guard’s dispositions triggered an ill-advised (in retrospect) hasty attack by the Portuguese.

Now, some rules impressions:

  1.  The Disease and Mishaps roles at the beginning of the game are something.  The Portuguese launched their hasty attack because the Civic Guard units were in disarray, with rolls that either moved units forward, or behind their line of initial deployment.
  2. The Portuguese were literally “saved” by their expert physician.  No less than four units had disease (normally resulting in loss of resolve) rolls that were negated by expert medical care.
  3. My rules interpretation is that a unit contacted by an opposing unit (that opposing unit having the initiative) can, in their subsequent movement phase, attempt to withdraw from melee before the melee phase begins.  This ability to disengage can be a mixed blessing.
  4. It’s a mixed blessing because the attacking unit can roll to pursue.  If successful, the attackers gets a charge bonus.  On the other hand, this is a mixed blessing for the attacker because this impetuousness can disrupt a coordinated assault.  I didn’t grasp this dynamic until this game.  It’s a welcome discovery, as it adds an uncertainty that I fondly (ahhh, and not so fondly remember) from the old Gush WRG rules.  The only Civic Guard unit destroyed was a result of continuing to pursue a unit.
  5. You can’t interpenetrate in this game.  Keep gaps open.  Not only for movement, but because wavering companies (resolve = 1) that contact other units cause the contacted to lose one resolve.

Now, the game photos with narrative captions.

Portuguese Begin Hasty Attack. Tribesmen Begin Move To Support Civic Guard
Portuguese Begin Hasty Attack. Tribesmen Begin Move To Support Civic Guard
First Contact! Tribesmen Have Closed The Faragh.
First Contact! Tribesmen Have Now Closed The Faragh.
First Contact, Looking West.
First Contact, Looking West.
Both Sides Regroup.
Both Sides Regroup.
Civic Guard Withdraws Through Tribesmen.
Civic Guard Withdraws Through Tribesmen.
Portuguese Begin Cautious Advance Towards Withdrawing Civic Guard
Portuguese Begin Cautious Advance Towards Withdrawing Civic Guard.

 

Going Tactical

While the Battle of Katlego Faragh has been raging, I’ve also been playing Ranger and (gulp) ASLSK.

Be careful what you wish for.  My last two games of Ranger have been nothing short of disasters.  Those combat scenarios are a lot tougher than a pure recon mission.   In one game, the squad barely moved past the perimeter before it was hit by a close ambush.  I forgot doctrine, and tried to break contact.  Wrong & BLAMMO.  Need to assault through a close ambush.

The next mission was an anti-armor ambush that went really well……except the getting home.  Again, another close ambush, but far from home and too many casualties to evacuate.  Well, the good thing about wargaming is that it’s just like “Edge of Tomorrow”.  Die, Learn, Try Again.  I really dread rolling 2-3, or 11-12.  As mentioned in my previous Ranger post, bad things happen.

ASLSK has been fun.  Playing the first scenario, rules-in-hand, one half-turn at a time.  With low counter density, no supporting weapons, and a methodical approach, it’s been a pleasant and not frustrating experience.  I’ll try another similar scenario, and then, perhaps, add crew-served weapons.   Unfortunately, the complete rules are in the No. 3 game, and I am loathe to spend $30+  for just a set of rules.  I have a lot of counters and scenarios to mess with already.   Got to figure that out using the ASL rules and the player’s guide.

Battle of Katlego Faragh – Army Dispositions

Ready to start the battle.

The Zanj could not accurately determine the location of the advancing Portuguese.  As a result, Bey Imen Mahir played it safe placing  his Civic Guard and Mercenary units to the west of the dune gap, and his Tribesmen to the east.  This involves some risk as the resolve of the western units will not be determined until first contact.

The Portuguese order of march has the Grenadiers and Tribesmen in van, followed by Crossbowmen, Pikes and Shot.  All of their forces are advancing on an axis west of the dunes.

dsc01601
Initial Dispositions
Civic Guard My old MiniFig "Any Period" Arabs
Civic Guard
My old MiniFig “Any Period” Arabs

Now that the enemy has been sighted, both sides must react.  Any reaction by the Portuguese or change in disposition by the Zanj will be decided using the D6 Programmed Wargames Scenario options.

The Zanj options are to redeploy all forces to the threatened side (1,2,3); move some forces to cover the Faragh (4,5); or redeploy the East forces  to cover the gap (6) and support the west flank.  I rolled a 6.

The Portuguese options are to bypass and keep moving north (1,2); destroy any enemy to their front and keep moving north (3,4); detach a force to seize the gap and, with the remaining force, destroy any enemy to their front (5,6).  The die roll was a 3.

 

Another Mission

Completed another Ranger reconnaissance mission (Card #3) yesterday afternoon.

Preparation time drastically reduced to about 15 minutes.  Kept my same roster and equipment from the last mission.  Plotting ingress and egress from the objective was straightforward.  I remembered to seal off the objective and PZ with supporting fires, as well as providing some contingency support at the LZ.

Managed to survive without incident.  Now I’m ready to move on to a combat mission.  Fun little game, small footprint.

Campaign Game – Renaldo’s Decision and Other Events

Well, Lord Renaldo’s wheels took a little longer to grind than promised.

The Zanj defeat raised several questions requiring resolution before the campaign continued.  These were 1) how much of the Zanj force was destroyed in the battle; 2) could the Zanj civic leaders be persuaded to provided the Sultan the additional resources to recruit more troops, and, if yes, 3) how many; 4) could the Sultan convince the Inland Natives to abandon their policy of hostile neutrality and provide assistance, as well as 5) convincing local Chinese merchants to seek Ming aide.

Answers to these questions were generated using the Campaign Table (which this process revealed to be flawed and in need of work), D6, and Yes/No/Maybe dice.

While the Zanj  fled the battlefield at Ejiro in great disarray, only two units had been shattered (D6/2).

The army conducted an orderly retreat to the south.  The Sultan hurried to Mwenye to implore local merchants and leaders to provide more support for his army, promising much (hopefully for him, he can keep those promises).  His entreaties were successful (re-roll on government support chart), and he was able to gain four units (D6) in reinforcements.

He also met with  local Chinese merchants, convincing them the Portuguese threat was real.  These merchants agreed to send a representative to the Ming leader in Aden. (Yes die rolls for the two questions).

The energetic Sultan Efe then contacted the leaders of the Inland Natives, requesting they reevaluate their position of hostile neutrality.  Again, making extravagant promises, he persuaded these leaders to at least be neutral, and to re-evaluate their position at an upcoming meeting of clan elders (re-roll on neutrality chart).

Hearing rumors of these activities, Lord Renaldo decided to turn north, and attack the port city of  Behefe.  The rationale is still to gain a victory over the weak defenders, gain a port, and let those results drive events both with his own government, and the local leadership.

His scouts are already determining the extent of the resistance…….

Fire In The Lake – AAR – Tim’s Take

Finally back from road trip.  Now I can post Tim’s observations about the game.  We have another session scheduled for Mid-December.

Here are my thoughts about Fire in the Lake-

  • We made a big mistake on the tunneled base rules.  They are much more difficult to remove than the regular bases.  I’m not sure it would have made a big difference in our game, but definitely something to note for future games.  BTW, I didn’t like the term ‘tunneled’.  I wish they’d used something different like ‘fortified’ or ‘entrenched’.
  • I wish I’d spotted the rules about South Vietnamese Rangers being able to raid across national borders.  It was really frustrating to watch the NVA building up in Laos and Cambodia.
  • The charts were very good.
  • I’m still laughing about the mistake of tracking ‘available’ units…We made that much harder than it had to be…:)
  • Very few of my units could both move and attack at the same time.  It felt like I was playing Paths of Glory!
  • Bombardment missions can really pay off for the NVA in the long run.  They provide a relatively cheap way of attritioning the COIN player.  I’m not sure if we removed to adjust ARVN aid to reflect US casualties (I think its something like -3 per unit killed– that adds up).
  • The VC need to adopt a ‘fleet-in-being’ strategy.  Admittedly the mistake about tunneled bases didn’t help, but they were rapidly wiped out in our game.  At one point you were using rally phases to make activate guerillas inactive.  It is really frustrating for the COIN player to see guerillas that have been activated by sweep operations go inactive during rally phases…A nice modeling of the frustrations of COIN operations.
  • On the rare turns when both of my factions started eligible it was a real dilemma whether or not to have them both run operations or have one pass so I would get a chance to respond to your moves during the next turn.
  • That game would play very differently with four players.  I don’t think the VC would let themselves get wiped out to the last man or the ARVN would let the Americans transfer large amounts of patronage to resources….
  • I kept forgetting to move the police out into the provinces, which hindered my pacification efforts.
  • Neither one of us did much fighting for the LOCS– I wonder if mass attacks on the LOCs would yield better results for the insurgent player.

Raid on St. Nazaire – Again

Started up another session.  Once again, discovered rules mistakes made during the last session.

The British can be attacked when in The Approaches, before movement.   And….the Germans have one searchlight operational for their first fire phase (a -1 on the to-hit die r0ll), and another searchlight becomes available for their second fire phase.

Fortunately for the British, the German die rolls were bad for their first fire phase.   However, the British Covering Fire was (again) useless, and the Germans could bring 6 firing factors to bear in the “A” zone during their second fire phase, which gave them twelve (!) attempts to damage British ships.  The result:  Bloodbath!

Still, the doughty Brits pressed on and are ready to land several intact teams of commandos.  Unfortunately, while the German Activation die rolls have been bad, the troops have been placed (by some strange hand of cardboard fate) right in or adjacent to their landing areas.

Should be interesting.

Fire In The Lake – AAR

Had a fun session with Tim this past weekend.  Full of fumbling and stumbling.

As discussed in an earlier post, this is a highly regarded game, with beautiful components.  And, as also discussed, for two old hex-and-counter Grognards, it promised to be a new experience, and not the type of card-driven game (Paths of Glory, Pursuit of Glory, Wilderness War, Wellington) we were used to playing.

This will be more an overview of the process, rather than a turn by turn narrative of the game we played.  I was so involved in figuring the damn thing out, that coherent recall much less thoughtful strategy was well beyond my capabilities.

First off, we really needed a picture of what the map board should look like when set up.  We messed up on where to put available cubes, what cubes to use as markers, and what counters go where.  It’s a new take on “idiot rules”, we need rules crafted for idiots.

The first difference we noticed between this and our previous card driven experiences was that each faction (USA, South Vietnam, Viet Cong, North Vietnam) cannot do something with each card.  Only two factions can play a card, and only one can play the card as an event.  Also, not only is the card in play turned up from the play deck, but also the next card to be played.  This forces players to anticipate how to react with two cards, not just one.

The deck itself is constructed differently.  In many games deck events and options are predicated on period of the conflict, or the play of a major event triggers the inclusion of more cards.  In FITL, the very large deck is initially split into six decks of twelve cards each.  A coup card is then shuffled into each deck.  Play commences with one deck, and after a Coup card is turned up and played, that Coup card is removed and the next deck placed under the remaining cards from the previously played deck.  There are a large number of cards that are not included in the six decks.  This must enhance replay.

Most card driven games involve reacting to an opponent’s play and  sequencing a group of cards held in hand.  This leads to a rapid sequence of play, with a card played quickly followed by another.  In FITL, the pace was less frantic, and steadier.  Maybe this was due to our inexperience.

The options for the first eligible faction (sequence of eligibility shown at the top of each card) are to pass (perhaps because of the next event) play the event, or play an operation (in multiple spaces), with or without a special activity. The second eligible player can pass, execute the event (if not done so by first player), or execute a limited operation.  Limited operations can take place in one space, only.  Only if the first two pass, can the third eligible faction act on a card.

We learned that Operations have complementary Special Operations, and successful play involved the ability to mix and match these operation types.  Also, the first eligible faction can really frustrate a stronger opponent by executing an Operation, only, after which the second eligible player can only execute a Limited Operation, not the Event.

All sides must be careful not to take too direct of an approach.  For the VC, taxing to raise resource levels or terrorizing the populace will alienate the local population, reducing support.  US airstrikes, while devastating militarily, are just as damaging to popular support.

While control of areas and provinces is the key to victory, each side has other activities,(not just destruction of enemy forces and many times in conflict with those of their “ally”) that contribute to victory.  For the VC and NVA, base building and maintaining the Ho Chi Minh trail must be a priority.  For the US, it’s ability to win is directly tied to reducing the number of troops being used.  ARVN forces gain victory points by siphoning off US aid into their coffers.

All of this maneuvering comes to a grinding halt when a Coup card is turned up.  The card in play is then considered to be a Monsoon card, which limits operational play options, and the Coup card is then the last card played.  After play for that card is finished,  victory points are calculated.  If a faction wins, it wins.  If not,  new aid and resources are distributed, and victory points are again calculated.  If one faction has attained victory, the other factions know it and the last deck is played.  An interesting way of changing play strategy and perspective.

Tim will be posting up his observations.

We’re playing this one again in December.