RAF – Latest Scenario Played

Sanity prevailed and I played The Thin Blue Line scenario, rather than the entire campaign. At my rate of play, which is one day per session, it would have been too lengthy a proposition.

The Thin Blue Line begins on August 27 and ends on September 11th. This represents the longest period of sustained German raids.

I was able to attrit the Luftwaffe, but not enough to gain a victory. However, the RAF was in good shape at game’s end with a fairly deep pool of experienced replacement pilots and plenty of replacement aircraft. At the rate things were going, an operational victory was probably two days (of game turns) away.

The hour and day card draws tended to favor the British player. What the British player cannot stand is successive German raids over the period of one game hour, or during the course of a day. The quicker the clock and calendar moves, the better for the RAF.

One thing I started doing a little too late was making sure there were enough British fighters scrambled to attack the bombers, and not just the Me-109 hunter groups. This involved massing planes and taking some risks about subsequent coverage if there were followup raids, or another series of attacks. My warning levels were consistently high which helped, and, once again, the card draw kept the clock moving.  It was so similar to historical “Big Wing” theory.

Once bombers are disrupted, aborted or placed in the damage box by a fighter attack, the effectiveness of a raid is greatly diminished. Again, fate did not favor the Germans, with many raids reduced to a low factor attacks, and resulting low levels of damage and victory points.

A great game, and worthy of all the praise it has gathered over the past twenty years. My only complaint is that a couple of charts are buried in the rules, especially the Airfield Operations summary. I will copy this onto a separate sheet the next time I play.

Paths of Glory – Tim’s Take

Here are Tim’s observations.
  • There a couple of cards that should not be allowed to cycle through the deck.  Even if the prerequisites to play the card haven’t been met, I think it would be wise to keep it in the hand until they are.  I’m thinking mainly of the ‘Tsar Takes Command’ card.  IIRC, there was another game we played where the central powers player didn’t play it as an event and had to wait for it to cycle back through the deck.  Needless to say, the game was pretty much over when it came back to him again.  I don’t think it is as big an issue for the Entente.  Maybe the cards relating to  US Entry fall into this category for them?
  • You did a much better job of remembering to entrench than I did…The level 2 trench in  Brussels cost me a lot of men.
  • Yes, I did use attrition in the west.  I was playing a lot of big replacement cards to keep the Russians from melting away (you pounded them pretty hard) and I didn’t see why I should ‘waste’ the French and British replacements by not attacking on their front.  I also had some mandated offensives for the French and I was trying to wear down the Germans, which I think I had accomplished by the end of the game.
  • I think taking replacements every turn is pretty much a must in this game.  I know you felt you had the opportunity to do some damage by playing cards as OPS cards and not taking replacements, but armies can melt away very quickly in this game.
  • I actually was worried that you were going to counter attack on the Italian front.  The Italian armies, especially when they are reduced (like they are at the start) are not very strong.  They’re good enough to capture undefended areas, but struggle against anything else…  I was concerned that you would use the Austrian army in Trieste to punch through and capture Venice.
  • Good use of the Rathenau card.  I think in the past I’ve violated my first point and usually played it for OPS…:)
  • You didn’t seem to get much use out of the Turks.  I don’t know if it would have been worth it to build up some concentrations in the Caucasus or in Mesopotomia to threaten Baku or Ahwaz.  In many ways the trick to winning POG is balancing the demands of multiple fronts and the Turks could be used to threaten those two areas (or if they’re very lucky, egypt).  At the very least, they might force the Entente to spend time and OPS moving troops to the Med from other theaters.
  • I think it would be a good idea to eliminate the Serbs.  Destroying them frees up two badly needed Austrian armies and some bulgarian troops for use elsewhere (Romania?).

Paths of Glory

Played Paths of Glory this Saturday with Tim. Helluva game and unlike any other we had played in the past. We started at 2PM and, with the exception of a 1 hour or so break for dinner, didn’t finish up until midnight. For once we stayed on task although many Henry’s were consumed. Tim played the Allies.

For those of you unfamiliar with the game, here’s a link to the BoardGameGeek page. It’s their Number 2 rated wargame.  Here’s another link to the living rules over at GMT Games. GMT is to be commended for their willingness to make the rules available along with necessary changes.

I managed to bungle the first few turns by misplaying the Falkenhayn card. This is a critical card that not only allows German forces greater operational flexibility but, when combined with combat cards, allows for a devastating attack on French fortresses.

Having missed that opportunity, I began to entrench along the Western Front. My efforts were generally successful, but set an ugly precedent for die rolling. To successfully entrench, one needs low die rolls. Unfortunately, this low rolling continued during several later critical combats where high D6 rolls are needed.

Frustrated in the West, I turned my attentions Eastward. Here, Tim had driven back my Austrians and it was only through some fortunate card draws for Austrian reinforcements, as well as a shifting of German troops to the East, that the front stabilized.

Stymied, I had no choice but to unleash the Mad Dog Bulgarians. Tim countered the threat posed by this crew of corps-sized-ants, by bringing Italy into the war. His lightning campaign in the Alps threatened Munich and Strasberg (!!!!!) forcing a southwestward shift of the already over-extended Austrians.

To compound matters, Tim activated the cosmetically challenged Romanians, creating a three-way “Titanic Battle of the Midgets” between Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria. Once again, Austrians were used to stabilize matters.

While this farcical sequence of Balkan events was taking place, Tim began a series of attritional attacks in the West. Ignoring howls of protest from Paris, and accusations of genocidal Francophobia, Tim took a page from the Neville playbook and relied on the French Army to repeatedly pound the heavily improved German positions in Flanders. These attacks liberated Brussels, and forced me to once again use strategic cards for operational replacements.

The result was no Russian Revolution. The revolution requires the play of a sequence of cards after a certain level of victory points have been attained. Use the card(s) for other than the intended purpose(s) and the sequence is delayed until the deck is exhausted and reshuffled.

I still pursued an eastern strategy, and even managed to isolate Riga while advancing deep into northern Russia. However, these gains could not be followed up given the need to create replacements and feed Tim’s Western Front meat grinder.

We shut it down at the beginning of the Winter, 1918 turn. While the issue hung in the balance, Tim definitely had the operational edge. My only real hope of victory was to somehow draw the right Russian Revolution cards, releasing German troops for the Western Front, and Austrians to deal with the Balkans and Italy.

Unfortunately, all of this was about three turns too late, and required just a little too much luck. Sounds kinda familiar, doesn’t it?

Here’s a few photos of the situation, by front, at Journey’s End.

Middle East: Not much going on here
Middle East: Not much going on here
The Balkans: Antricide
The Balkans: Antroicide
Russia: Bogged Down
Russia: Bogged Down
Italy: Arditi and Bersaglieri in Munich?
Italy: Arditi and Bersaglieri in Munich?
Western Front: Attrition
Western Front: Attrition

New Dice

As part of the ongoing grappling with solo gaming, I purchased several types of dice over the past few weeks.

DSC01394

The top die is for points of the compass.  Could be used for entries for opposing forces, reinforcements, etc.

The row below is to be used for decision making.  Which course of action to take?

The big die have various body parts labeled.  Great for solo gaming, especially with these guys…..my Warhammer Renaissance Skirmishers.   This should eliminate the drudgery of chart reading for “hits”.

DSC01121

The bottom two rows are directional.  Useful for creating some type of AI for your opposition force/forces.

All the dice are manufactured by Koplow Games.

Looking forward to coming up with creative ways of using them.

 

 

RAF – End Of Scenario Thoughts

Finished up “The Hardest Days” scenario. Lots of fun.

Like many solitaire games, RAF is process oriented. The turn sequence mechanics are the crux of the game, with player decisions taking far less time than in a typical multi-player game.

The obvious reasons are the low counter density, and the player’s active involvement with counter movement is limited to the RAF. Another reason is that many of the mechanics are card driven, without the usual wristage.

The lessons learned during this play through were to take full advantage of the ability of adjacent sectors to patrol in those sectors most threatened, that at least once a day you just have to take a beating, and use everything you can on the last raid of the day.

Squadrons in adjacent sectors can augment patrols. This is a far better use of these assets than waiting for a favorable warning situation which allows the employment of adjacent squadrons in the target sector,.

With followup raids and limited time advances, the RAF will have at least one turn when most of its assets are either landing or rearming. Sending up a single squadron to contest a raid is suicide, so it is best to just sit back, get bombed, and wait until your grounded aircraft become operational.

By the 1800 turn (last of the day), the Luftwaffe has few assets remaining. This can be especially true for fighters. That last raid may comprise only a couple of escorts. If the RAF commander places all of his available assets on patrol, the chances are that he can achieve air superiority for that interception and really do some damage to the bombers. This tactic is so effective that there is actually a rule limiting the number of patrolling squadrons for the 1800 turn.

My game ended in a draw. I might just try the campaign scenario which adds several layers of chrome. Why not?

Renaissance Wargame – The Action Pt 3

What a dog fight!  The Poles right wing is shattered, with Tartars enveloping that flank.  However, the Dvor Sipahis’ attempts to repulse the Polish Haiduks threatening the Russia  rear failed.

The Polish cavalry are now a beaten command, with only the Hussars having a reasonable chance of being steadied.  The left flank Pancerni have been attrited and the light cavalry is incapable of any real resistance.

With all that, I still might play a couple more turns to see how the doughty Haiduks fare.

Haiduks Deploy
Haiduks Deploy
Polish Left is Shattered. Russian Cavalry Begins Envelopment
Polish Right is Shattered. Russian Cavalry Begins Envelopment
Russian Dvor Sipahis Regroup After Being Repulsed By Haiduk Musketry
Russian Dvor Sipahis Regroup After Being Repulsed By Haiduk Musketry

Solo DBR (De Bellis Renationis) Tweaks

Been thinking about my solo play of DBR and ways to artificially interject some variety. By artificially I mean using random generators for a scenario, rather than just pre determining scenario inputs.

I won’t bore you with the overall thought process. What thinking that did take place was random and unfocused, flitting about with all types of tables and charts to reflect temperment, efficiency, and morale by CinC, sub-general, troop type and unit. After messing around with various and increasingly arcane methodologies, it dawned on me that I had to work “inside” the rules, not outside of them.

Let’s assume that Phil Barker is a superior game designer. If that assumption is made, then the parts are connected to the whole and his system, at the very least, abstracts many considerations that are presented in a far more granular manner in other rule sets. Think Gush’s (very good) Renaissance rules.

When this series of assumptions is made, then any changes reflecting my three criteria (temperment, competency, morale) must be inside, or within Rules as Written (RAW).

If the objective is to add variety, but directly and without undue complications, then some general assumptions have to be made.

First and foremost is that the army will reflect the temperment of their general. I’m playing games with about 150-200 points, so only need a CinC. There’s no way I want to get into the business of creating an AI to guide the behaviors of various types of generals. However, I can directly, and within, DBR’s rules guide how the army will behave.

The three categories for the CinC are rash, steady and cautious. Elements or groups in a “rash” army will always followup and pursue, regardless of troop type. A “steady” army will follow RAW, since Barker has built in typical behaviors into his troop types. A “cautious” army will not followup or pursue in any situation.

Individual unit competency will be reflected in their (as Barker puts it) “efficiency”. Units can be up or down graded from the “Superior”, “Ordinary”, and “Inferior” ratings contained in RAW. I did not mess with “Fast” since this seems to be heavily dependent on fighting style. A change in ratings effects combat outcomes, and for shooters, a decrease in effective range. I decided not to downgrade movement for “Inferior” shot units to that of a “Horde”, or from 150 paces to 100.

As with my CinC ratings and effects, morale will be army-wide.

Morale is reflected by changing the criteria for a “Beaten Command”, as well as the rallying and steadying units of a Beaten Command. RAW has an army becoming beaten when casualties exceed one-third of its individual element strength. When this threshold is crossed, groups of elements can be steadied (in that turn, only), if not steadied, the units rout, but can be rallied element by element during subsequent turns. All of this takes Player Initiative Points (PIPs), which are generated by a D6 roll for that turn.

An army with good morale will use the RAW over one-third element criteria. An army with high morale will become beaten with a threshold over forty percent, and an army with low morale will have its threshold drop to over twenty-five percent.

An army with high morale takes one PIP to rally an element or steady a group. An army with good morale takes the RAW two PIPs per, and an army with bad morale takes three PIPs per.

How all of this works in a campaign is another question. I’ll try this out once I finish the current Pole vs. Russian game.

Renaissance Wargame – The Action Pt 2

Solo war gaming can be either mundane or chaotic.  This is the latter.

Poles right flank caves in and losses mount, with center Hussars in disarray due to musketry.  Still some hope, as Haiduks and Pancerni attack on the left.  A wacky tactical revolving door.

Polish Right Flank: Problems
Polish Right Flank: Problems
Polish Left Flank: Haiduks Deploying and Pancerni Ready To Charge
Polish Left Flank: Haiduks Deploying and Pancerni Ready To Charge
Russians React and Poles Hope
View To The West:  Russians React and Poles Hope

RAF – Initial Thoughts

Finally comfortable enough with the rules to start the “Hardest Days” scenario.  This is a highly regarded solitaire game with great reviews.  I started out with “Lion”, playing the British.

For a solitaire game, it has a relatively low level of wristage.  The game process and progress is, to a large degree,  driven by cards; for targets, raid size, raid strength, approach events, target events and passage of time during a raid “day”.  Dice rolling is limited to combat results, bombing results, British ability to respond to attacks and weather.

Unlike many other games, the end of a raid does not mean the time clock advances.  There can be raid somewhere else over England, or a followup raid on the target just attacked.  Have a couple of “0” time advance results, and it makes for a damn long turn, and day.

As a result, the RAF is stretched thin and beat up from the get-go.  Their warning system is not good, and this restricts the ability of the RAF to respond in any strength – from adjacent sectors – to a raid.  Even a minor raid can leave the RAF out-manned, especially when a sector has been attacked several times during the day.   In most instances, the RAF cannot even get to the bombers, having all their assets engaged by German “Hunter” gruppen.

The instructions advertise that the 5-Day, “Hardest” scenario can be played in three hours.  Don’t think so.  One day takes about an hour, and that’s now that I can play without my nose buried in the rules.

Gonna keeping hacking at it, and see if the game play speeds up.  Keep hoping for those “2 Hour” time advance cards.  Both the Brits and I need them!

 

 

 

Renaissance Wargame – The Action Pt 1

Was able to play several turns of my Poles vs. Russians DBR game.

The initial Polish Hussar attack on the formed Russian Streltsi was repulsed, as was a Cossack charge against the Russian Tartar light cavalry.

Attempts by the Hussars to reform were continually frustrated by Streltsi musketry. Both the Polish  Pancerni (Armored Cossacks)  and Russian Boyars moved to support their comrades. The Russian charge on their left shattered the Pancerni and Cossacks. The right wing Boyars maneuvered to engage the Polish left’s Pancerni.

Engrossed by this action, I forgot to role for the variable turn entrance on the Polish Haiduk infantry. The first role allowed them to enter on both roads leading into the village.

This seemed like a good time to quit for the evening.

A sessions report would not be complete without impaired photography.

Polish Pancerni Advance
Polish Pancerni Advance
Russian Boyars Begin Their Advance
Russian Boyars Begin Their Advance
Hussars and Pancerni Unsuccessfully Melee with Streltsi
Hussars and Pancerni Unsuccessfully Melee with Streltsi
Winged Hussars Attempt To Reform For Another Charge
Winged Hussars Attempt To Reform For Another Charge
Haiduks Enter Through Village
Haiduks Enter Through Village